Comments on: After 79 Years in Print, Newsweek Quits To Go Digital

By: John Souza

John Souza — Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:58:33 +0000

@Wayne – agreed. We’ll all be sad to see the glossy paper editions go, but its better for everyone – cheaper for the magazine, better for the environment, and more convenient for the reader. – John

By: Wayne Turner

Wayne Turner — Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:28:33 +0000

Some are saying it’s sad when a paper publication comes to an end. I think it’s progress and although I am not tree hugger, it’s going to do a lot for the environment. I have been reading digital for 10 years and the more there is the better.
All the best for digital success in 2013.

By: John Souza

John Souza — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:20:23 +0000

@Imran – certainly, and I predict that publishing companies will move into digital more and more, until they are able to control this space, like they did when they first privatized print. It will be interesting to see what comes of this progression – new devices, new software and better ways to share digital information I’m sure! – John

By: Imran Rahman

Imran Rahman — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:29:00 +0000

Things like these confirm that change is the only constant and that a business must be prepared and willing to evolve with the times, even when it means completely changing how things are done!